This is the generation that will abolish abortion

Top 12 Reasons to Defund Planned Parenthood Now

This was originally posted by The Susan B Anthony List

1. President Obama and Senate Democrats are willing to shut down the federal government to ensure tax dollars keep flowing to one of their biggest political allies. During his run for president, Planned Parenthood Action Fund endorsed Obama, marking only the second time in their history that they endorsed in a presidential election.[i] They poured money into his campaign and churned out volunteers. Imagine the reaction if a Republican president was willing to shutdown the government in order to prevent a single organization from sharing one penny in the belt-tightening all Americans are facing.

2. Planned Parenthood is an independently wealthy entity. According to its latest annual report, it has nearly one billion dollars in net assets.[ii] Data shows that over the last nine years, Planned Parenthood has taken in over $500 million in profits.[iii]

3. Planned Parenthood is America’s largest abortion provider. One out of every four abortions in the U.S. is performed in a Planned Parenthood facility. Data shows that since 1970, Planned Parenthood has performed at least 5.3 million abortions. In 2009 alone, Planned Parenthood performed a record 332,278 abortions.[iv]

4. Planned Parenthood’s business model is centered on abortion. Former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson has written that she was given an “abortion quota” and was even told by her superiors to double the number of abortions in order to bring in more revenue.[v] Abortion patients constitute 12 percent of Planned Parenthood clients — 332,000 of 3 million unduplicated clients in its most current report. 37 percent of all Planned Parenthood clinic income revenue is from abortion procedures, according to conservative estimates. Planned Parenthood has issued a directive instructing that all affiliates must have at least one clinic that performs abortion by 2013.[vi]

5. More taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood equals more abortions, fewer adoption referrals. Claims that taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood results in fewer abortions are false. From 2000 to 2009, Planned Parenthood saw an 80 percent increase in taxpayer funding, receiving $202 million in 2000 and $363 million in 2009. In 2000, Planned Parenthood performed 197,070 abortions while making 2,486 adoption referrals. In 2009, they performed 332,278 abortions and made just 977 adoption referrals. That means an 80 percent increase in taxpayer funding resulted in a 69 percent increase in the number of abortions and a 61 percent decrease in the number of adoption referrals.[vii]

6. Planned Parenthood is not safe for women and young girls. Recent undercover footage released by Lila Rose’s Live Action shows Planned Parenthood employees in several states willing to aid and abet in acknowledged human sex trafficking of girls as young as 14.[viii] The undercover footage resulted in the firing of Amy Woodruff, manager of the Central New Jersey Planned Parenthood clinic.[ix] It also caused Planned Parenthood to call for mandatory training sessions of thousands of its employees across the country on reporting requirements.[x

7. Planned Parenthood opposes commonsense measures to protect women and underage girls. Presently, Planned Parenthood is fighting a bill in Illinois that would require its staff and volunteers to be mandatory reporters when they suspect the sexual abuse of minors. They’ve also consistently fought parental notification laws – all the way to the Supreme Court – which would simply inform a parent if their underage daughter is seeking an abortion. They’ve opposed state efforts to impose health and safety regulations for abortion facilities.[xi]

8. Women have other options for seeking primary care, contraception, STI testing, and cancer screening. According to the Chiaroscuro Foundation, in addition to the tens of thousands of U.S. doctors and hospitals providing this care, there were 1,048 federally qualified health centers in the U.S. which provide women cancer screening, contraception, and STI testing.[xii]

9. Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms and is not a significant primary care provider to women. Despite claims made by Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards and members of the media, Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms. They are also not a significant primary care provider in general. In recent reports, Planned Parenthood acknowledges that it provided primary care only to about 19,700 of its 3 million unduplicated clients. These services have been trending downward for years, from 21,247 in 2007 to 20,235 in 2008, to today’s 19,796.[xiii]

10. Polling shows Americans don’t believe efforts to defund Planned Parenthood are extreme. A March 2011 poll conducted by The Hill, before Planned Parenthood became a critical issue in the budget debate, showed that Americans are virtually split in half over whether Planned Parenthood’s funding should be left alone or completely cut. Forty-six percent said it should be left alone; 42 percent said it should be completely cut. The poll has a 3 percent margin of error.[xiv] When asked specifically about taxpayer funding of abortion, polls consistently show a healthy majority of Americans, 60 to 70 percent, oppose their tax dollars funding abortion.[xv]

11. Planned Parenthood’s founder, Margaret Sanger, was a strong believer in eugenics. Following is just a sampling of her documented beliefs. “In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation…”[xvi] Referring to immigrants and Catholics, she wrote: “[They’re] an unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”[xvii] She also wrote, “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”[xviii] Planned Parenthood is carrying on her legacy today, centering itself on population control efforts. In a recently filed tax return, Planned Parenthood stated as part of their mission statement that they are committed to “a U.S. population of stable size in an optimum environment.”[xix]

12. Planned Parenthood has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and thousands of hours of employee time in order to protect its government handout. Planned Parenthood has flooded the airwaves with TV commercials[xx] and radio ads[xxi] in order to protect its funding. Its employees – whose paychecks are subsidized by tax dollars — have participated in bus tours and rallies across the country.[xxii]

[i] Planned Parenthood Press Release, “Planned Parenthood Action Fund Endorses Barack Obama,” July 7, 2008

[ii] Chiaroscuro Foundation Report, “Does Planned Parenthood Need or Deserve Federal Funds?,” March, 2011

[iii] Life Issues Institute, “Planned Parenthood Fact Page”, 2011

[iv] Chiaroscuro Foundation Report, “Does Planned Parenthood Need or Deserve Federal Funds?,” March, 2011

[v] Abby Johnson Op-Ed in The Hill, “Exposing the Planned Parenthood business model,” April 4, 2011

[vi] Chiaroscuro Foundation Report, “Does Planned Parenthood Need or Deserve Federal Funds?,” March, 2011

[vii] SBA List Press Release, “Fact Check: Clinton Misleads on Planned Parenthood Funding,” April 6, 2011

[viii] Live Action Press Release, “Caught on Tape: Planned Parenthood Aids Pimp’s Underage Sex Ring,” February 1, 2011

[ix] New Jersey Star Ledger, “Central Jersey Planned Parenthood fires worker after release of undercover video,” February 2, 2011.

[x] New York Times, “Planned Parenthood to Retrain Public Staff,” February 7, 2011

[xi] Dr. Helen Alvare op-ed in the Weekly Standard, “Note to Congress: Planned Parenthood is Not a ‘Women’s Health’ Organization,” April 6, 2011

[xii] Chiaroscuro Foundation Report, “Does Planned Parenthood Need or Deserve Federal Funds?,” March, 2011

[xiii] Ibid.

[xiv] The Hill, “The Hill Poll: Planned Parenthood cut splits voters by gender, race,” March 28, 2011

[xv] CNN: “Poll: Majority favor abortion funding ban,” November 18, 2009

[xvi] Birth Control Review, “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” October 1921, page 5.

[xvii] Margaret Sanger, “Pilot of Civilization,” p. 187

[xviii] Margaret Sanger, “Women and the New Race,” 1920

[xix] Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2008 Income Tax Return

[xx] YouTube, “Planned Parenthood Action Fund TV Ad: Carolyn Telling Her Story,” February 25, 2011

[xxi] NPR, “Planned Parenthood Radio Ads To Target Congressional Opponents,” February 18, 2011

[xxii] Planned Parenthood, “Planned Parenthood Truth Tour Cities & Events,” March 29, 2011

8 Comments

  1. Posted April 8, 2011 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Your #1 reason is that Planned Parenthood is (according to you) an Obama supporter. This makes your motivation clear: you hate Obama and you’ll do anything to attack him, including try to shut down one of the largest providers of contraception and STD prevention services.

    Thank you for your honesty! I was pretty sure this was all about politics, and your confirmation of this is welcome!

  2. Intelligent Female
    Posted April 8, 2011 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Lies, lies, and more lies. Anyone who swallows this tripe is an uneducated fool. Taxpayer dollars pay for low cost medical care, including cancer screenings and disease prevention. It is against the law for tax dollars to be used to pay for abortions. Defunding Planned Parenthood will deny millions of people the only healthcare they have access to. Last time I checked there was no shortage of unwanted children waiting to be adopted. Unless you’re willing to adopt, care for, educate, and fund every single child born as a result of PP’s defunding, kindly keep out of my uterus.

    Take that hanger and scratch your back!

    • Ellie
      Posted April 9, 2011 at 7:09 am | Permalink

      “kindly keep out of my uterus.”

      Then kindly stop using MY tax dollars to fund your bedroom activity.

  3. Nikki
    Posted April 8, 2011 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Bryan, I agree with you, but I think it would have been better if you had put the Obama related reason lower on the list. The other reasons are much more compelling.

    • Posted April 8, 2011 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

      Nikki I did not write this, it was written by the Susan B Anthony list so I cannot change it. I just posted it.

  4. Posted April 9, 2011 at 1:27 am | Permalink

    Dear Intelligent Female,

    Given your self-proclaimed intelligence, can you explain to me how taking away Federal funds from an organization that turns a $500 million in profits will deny millions of people the only healthcare they have access to?

    Surely there are more than enough funds in PP’s coffers to more than make up for the loss of federal funds.

    For some one who calls herself intelligent, you sure seem to be a moron.

  5. Morghan
    Posted April 11, 2011 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Why do people see #1 as being about Obama?

    The real issue here is that a taxpayer funded organization is sinking large sums of money in to the campaigns of politicians who will support them.

    No group that receives even a single penny of our tax dollars should be allowed to be involved in funding elections.

    Now if they were defunded they’d have every right to take whatever money they made and support politicians loyal to their cause, but spending tax dollars to ensure the continued supply is unethical.

  6. JDollar
    Posted April 13, 2011 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Intelligent female,

    You point out it’s illegal for taxpayer’s dollars to go to abortion but that’s not the point. It doesn’t matter if technically the federal funds aren’t paying for the abortion expenses because as long as they are funding PP they are ENABLING abortion expenses.
    Any money the org., would raise for medical care costs, etc. is replaced by tax dollars and is now instead used for abortion expenses, so what’s the difference really? Not to mention that those tax dollars are still paying for the room the abortions are in and for the electricty for the building they are performed in.

    Good point RR, if they take in a $500 mil profit, why would it be so hard for them to supply women with healthcare? I thought they were a not-for profit organization, isn’t 500mil enough?

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>